UltraSearch 10g: Moving indexes to new TS, crawler errors, and robot excluding.
UltraSearch 10g: Moving indexes to new TS, crawler errors, and robot excluding.
2005-03-02 - By Jesse, Rich
Hey all,
Anyone here using Oracle's Ultra Search? The MetaLink forum is = apparently unmonitored and even Google hasn't helped much. I've got = some outstanding issues (at least three) on our 10.1.0.3.0 Ultra Search = instance running on Solaris9.
First, after successfully crawling our intranet, I see that the = DR$WK$DOC_PATH_IDX$I table (presumably an Oracle Text object) is growing = much larger than I had expected. While there's no immediate need, = should I want to move this to another tablespace, how? I seem to = remember that Oracle does not support the movement of some Oracle Text = objects, but I'll be darned if I can find info on this.
Second, I'm getting some crawler errors in the logs. It started off = with an ORA-00001 (See ORA-00001.ora-code.com) on WK$CACHE_PK and has seemingly turned into = "ORA-01003 (See ORA-01003.ora-code.com), no statement parsed" since. MetaLink says the ORA-1 (See ORA-1.ora-code.com) is = fixed and there's no articles on the latter. Methinks not.
Third, I'm using a robots.txt file to exclude the web paths to be = crawled, but since our intranet uses frames (despite my insistance that = frames are evil, like the fruits of the devil, evil) the navigation = frames are being included in the crawl. I've tested using the ROBOTS = META tag to disregard indexing the navbar, but follow it's links, but it = looks like Ultra Search ignores those. Anyone successfully use a = different method?
If this is like my previous Ultra Search posts, I won't hold my breath = for an answer...
TIA anyway, Rich
Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator rich.jesse@(protected) QuadTech, Sussex, WI USA -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
